Some weeks later, you receive a couple of threatening letters stating that you owe the same amount as before plus another amount that you can’t figure out. Still feeling confused and frustrated, you send them another letter asking for a detailed breakout of what is owed and state that you will be paying off the two months of unpaid rent payments by sending a check for RM20 per month until the debt is paid off. You enclose a check for RM20 and send the letter and check certified mail to the agency.
The agency receives your letter, cashes your check, but calls and leaves you a message saying that they do not accept the terms of your payback plan, and to pay the total amount due immediately or risk a lawsuit. You assume that since they cashed the check, they are legally accepting your RM20 per month payback terms, and you continue to send monthly RM20 payments under this assumption.
This scenario is a good example of a consumer operating without knowing the law. There is no law that says that since the collection agency cashed the check, they are accepting the terms of his payback plan. In fact, their cashing the check means nothing, except that you have made a small payment on the debt you owe. The next step the agency will likely take is to file suit against you.